tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4068822035923402169.post8476916158859472428..comments2024-03-28T14:14:20.774-04:00Comments on The BIG HOUSE Blog: Roy Round 2Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4068822035923402169.post-5729835244502652372012-11-12T10:11:43.566-05:002012-11-12T10:11:43.566-05:00VOR, I agree with you. Devin is a QB, I don't...VOR, I agree with you. Devin is a QB, I don't mind them getting him on the field at WR but he is a QB first. I thought he was always the #2 and would come in when needed. I was wrong. <br /><br />It's hard to bench Denard but during the Bama and ND games, we could have had a lift from another type of QB. Sort of a Brady - Henson type of deal. Or how NW managed their two QB's during US this week. I would have liked to have seen Michigan mix it up a bit because it's clear Michigan is completely a different team on offense when Devin is in there. For example: Hello Roy Roundtree.Bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14636228962334160454noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4068822035923402169.post-86819223601804436602012-11-10T18:37:36.785-05:002012-11-10T18:37:36.785-05:00NW played us tough today...lucky win! We cannot ma...NW played us tough today...lucky win! We cannot make any mistakes going forward, bet Iowa plays the best game of the year against us too. Thank goodness for Roundtree, the D, and DG! GO BLUE!Lionmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14172990128520307925noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4068822035923402169.post-85409927079299310962012-11-10T17:57:50.488-05:002012-11-10T17:57:50.488-05:00I'm beginning to think the DG would have been ...I'm beginning to think the DG would have been a better option against those teams that have "figured out" Denard. The offense is completely different when each are at the controls. I think it is becomming obvious that DG should have been given the controls when DR went out in those losses even though he didn't have any good snaps in practice those weeks. Russell B was completely out of his league and should be considered an emergency only option. I don't know if one of the walk-ons wouldn't have done any better. <br /><br />One of the initial questions should have been asked by the staff at the beginning of the year, "What is more important to have locked down, the reserve QB or the 3rd WR option?" I'm thinking that the answer would have been the QB position, although I believe that it was smart to get DG on the field which helped him to get a good feel for the game speed, I see DG as a QB first and I would have given him some meaningful snaps at practice every week, and he would have been my first option off the bench. [How's that for hind sight reasoning?]Voice of Reasonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09249702271701679486noreply@blogger.com